Caterpillar

Redesigning a ticketing system

Caterpillar 2022 UX Design Challenge winner.
Mockups of Cat dashboard, app screens, and Caterpillar logo
Year
2022
Role
UX Designer
UX Researcher
Tools
Figma
Team
Hailey Fetting
Remi Wagemann

Overview

Problem

Dissatisfaction in the communication level between customers and dealers. Also, want to more accurately track the time of maintenance requests — from beginning to completion.
All software created had to follow Caterpillar design constraints and utilize their UI library.

Outcome

Designed a solution over the course of the semester, participated in user testing with Caterpillar employees, and showcased our work in a presentation at Caterpillar's digital headquarters. Our team was chosen as the competitions winner due to our user-based approach.

What I did

  • User experience design
  • User interface/interaction design
  • User research
  • Usability testing
  • Wireframing and prototyping
  • Client/stakeholder presentation

Deliveries

  • High Fidelity Prototype
  • User testing results and findings
  • Presentation documenting process and outcome

Client Challenge

Caterpillar Inc. holds an annual UX design challenge focused around problems currently troubling the company. This year they wanted to improve the Dealer work order (WO) system. A work order is a way to track maintenance and upkeep of machinery.

Takeaways

  • Solve obstacles facing the user and educating stakeholders
  • Changing the UI isn't always the best course of action
  • Usability testing results

Solve obstacles facing the user and educating stakeholders

Our team presented an idea bigger than an interface redesign. Judges noted that other teams approached improving the look and feel of the work order system, but we were focused on solving the root causes of the issue.

Taking a step back to look at the WO process as a whole, allowed my team to deliver a solution that solved the apparent struggles between dealers and customers. By effectively communicating our design decisions, we were able to persuade our stakeholders in a way that it was educational and digestible.

Dealer Approach

To reduce the dealer’s workload, we decided to utilize user generated data. A majority of service request information can be gathered passively or directly from mobile input. Information like company info, location, and machine information (saved in user data) would serve as the basis for a work order request.

Customer Approach

Research from Caterpillar noted that 80% of users prefer using mobile applications versus desktop. To include all desktop functionality for users, we need to add the following:

  • Submit work order request
  • Communicate with dealers and technicians
  • Send images and PDF documents
  • Comment on images and documents
  • Approve and sign documents

[ Work Order Request  Customer Flow ]

Customer contact information and machine identification auto-populates, so the user only needs to define the issue and schedule a service.

Previous flow

New flow

[ Work Order Automation  Dealer ]

Dealers can easily process work order request emails with the "Automate to INTERACT" button. When clicked, the the only information left for the dealer to input is the service technician, project status, and cost estimate.

[ Work Order Dashboard  Dealer ]

Completing the automation will automatically create a new work order and approval document, lowering the required manpower by more than half compared to current work order processes. All information regarding the work order can be viewed and edited within this dashboard.

Changing UI isn't always the best course of action

As stated previously, our team stood out to the judges. This is because other teams approached the problem as a user interface redesign. When working with a corporation like Caterpillar, it's beneficial to keep in mind how many people use their software on a daily basis. Changing the UI and UX of familiar software can negatively effect the workforce as a whole. For example, new training may have to be implemented which stalls the profitability of the implementation.

Usability Testing Results

Three users tested the interface while our team recorded the results. Here is a list of the changes made from our findings:

  • The button that expands/collapses the WO column was enlarged for visibility
  • The communication module title was changed from “CAT App” to “Customer Communications”
  • Email attachments were moved to the top of the page to follow user expectations
  • A proposal review screen prompted the dealer before confirming the automation